The
Gemara (Yoma
28b) states
that the earliest time we may recite the Minchah
prayer is "when the [eastern] faces of the walls begin to
darken." At face value this means that the prayer may be recited
immediately after solar noon, for at that point the sun has passed
into the western half of the sky which causes a shadow to fall over
the eastern faces of the walls, thus "darkening" them. The
Gemara
goes on to demonstrate that in practice, however, this is not the
case. We have as a general principle that our prayers correspond to
the tamid offerings brought in the Temple, and that the time period
allowed for the Minchah prayer is identical to that allotted for the
afternoon tamid offering (Berachos
26b). If so, the afternoon tamid may also be brought "when the
[eastern] faces of the walls begin to darken" yet we find that
the earliest permissible time for the afternoon tamid is half
an hour past noon. [When the Gemara
speaks of "half an hour," it refers not to standard
60-minute hours but to שעות
זמניות,
solar hours.
A solar hour is calculated by dividing the total amount of daylight
hours — sunrise to sunset — into twelve parts, and each part
represents one solar hour.] The Gemara
(Yoma loc.
cit.) suggests that there is no contradiction here because — unlike
standard walls — the eastern faces of the Temple walls only fell
into shadow at half an hour past noon. Rashi
explains that this resulted from the Temple walls being thicker at
their base than at their top; since they tapered as they rose, the
sun continued to shine on their eastern faces even past noon, and
only at half an hour past noon did the eastern faces finally darken
in shadow.
The
commentators explain that the Temple walls were purposely built in
this fashion to ensure that the afternoon tamid offering not be
brought too early (see Tos. Yeshanim to Yoma loc. cit.
and Rabbeinu Tam, Sefer Hayashar §308.). [They
understand that the tamid offering could, in theory, be brought
immediately after noon. By building the Temple walls as described
above, it created a buffer of half an hour to safeguard against
bringing the offering earlier than noon.] Since the movement of the
sun varies with the seasons, the length of a solar hour also changes
throughout the year. One might think that the walls must be designed
so that their eastern faces will darken at half (of a solar hour)
past noon on any day of the year. This is not necessary, for the only
time that the tamid offering was permitted to be brought as early as
half past noon is when erev Pesach falls out on Friday and enough
time must be allowed after the tamid for the multitude of Pesach
offerings to be brought and roasted before the onset of Shabbos.
As a result, the Temple walls were designed to darken at half past
noon specifically on the fourteenth of Nisan (the approximate
date of the Spring equinox). [Although this phenomenon was meant to
be observed on interior of the Courtyard 's western wall – for the
benefit of those standing in the Courtyard – the text of the
Gemara indicates that all of the walls were designed in the same
fashion.]
The
position of the sun at half an hour past noon on the Spring equinox
in Jerusalem is a readily-quantifiable phenomenon, making it possible
to estimate the slope of the walls of the Temple.
Background
Sunrise
and sunset times can be generated mathematically for any date and
location on earth, and from this data it is possible to calculate the
time of solar noon as well as the length of the solar hours. Dividing
the length of a solar hour in half and adding it to the time for
solar noon yields the time of day (in local time) at which the sun is
at half past noon.
It
is also possible to mathematically pinpoint the position of the sun
in the sky relative to any given location on earth for any time and
date. This position is given by two angles, azimuth and elevation,
where azimuth is the angle between true north and the point on the
horizon directly below the sun, and elevation is the angle between
the line to the center of the sun and the horizontal plane. See
diagram:
Knowing
the azimuth and elevation angles of the sun at half past noon will
allow the slope of the Temple walls to be calculated.
(I could not paste the formulas into this post, but they appear here)
Data for Jerusalem
The
following set of data was generated/calculated for Jerusalem using
the coordinates of the Temple Mount of 31° 46’ (31.7781) N and 35°
14’ (35.2353) E and an elevation angle at sunrise/sunset of -0.8°
on the Spring equinox (actual date used was March 21, 2007):
Sunrise1 5:42
Sunset1 17:51
Solar
Noon2 11:46
Half
past noon2 12:16
Azimuth
at half past noon1 193.9º
Elevation
at half past noon1 57.6º
1
Generated
from U.S. Naval Observatory
(http://www.usno.navy.mil/USNO/astronomical-applications/data-services/alt-az-world,
accessed 9-26-10)
2
Calculated
Results
Using
a relative azimuth angle of 13.9º (193.9 - 180) for α
and an elevation angle of 57.6º for δ,
the slope of the Temple walls is calculated to be 8.67º from the vertical.
Fascinating, as your Torah on the Beis Hamikdash (and other topics) is always! THe Otzer Hageonim cites a different opinion that the walls were not sloped, rather, they were not running perfectly straight from north to south. The sun is due south at midday, but because the wall was on an angle, the sun did not cast a noticeable shadow off the wall to the east (from the west) until a half hour after midday. Have you ever calculated the angle of the wall?
ReplyDeleteWell, no I haven't. I have always favored Rashi's pshat since it fits with other sources (Josephus and the archeological record) which indicate that the walls did indeed taper as they rose. I have not checked to see if any of the Temple Mount walls taper to this same angle that I calculated above, although it does not necessarily have to be true that Herod rebuilt his walls to the exact angle as the original Beis Hamikdash (which I presume the Gemara is discussing).
DeleteAccording to Otzar Hageonim we must say that the walls must have been perfectly vertical since this special feature of לא מכווני applies only to their N-S orientation. It would be an interesting question to figure out the angle that puts the eastern face in shadow at half past noon.
I apologize, but I had misquoted the Otzer HaGeonim earlier. That opinion actually maintains that the walls were neither sloped nor on an angle. That opinion maintains that the shadow was cast immediately after midday and it is also stated by Rabbeinu Chananel and the Aruch.
ReplyDeleteThe view I present in this post follows that of Rashi. R' Ari Storch has examined this view further and found that, even according to Rashi, it may not be possible to determine the slope of the Temple walls precisely. See his blog post for more details.
ReplyDelete